If you prefer to listen to this blog post, click here.
Happy spring! I have no idea how we’re already in May, but here we are. And with the new month comes a new training challenge. Here’s the challenge for May:
Describe 1 construct or label using overt behavior
Okay. What the heck did I just say? This training challenge requires a bit of a vocabulary lesson. Now, y’all know I try to not be super vocab-heavy or technical in these blog posts, but this is one where the technical terms end up being the easiest way to communicate this concept. I promise to make it as painless as possible! Let’s dive in.
Overt vs. Covert Behavior
Overt behavior refers to observable, measurable behavior. Examples of this include:
- The person took three steps to the right
- The hawk is flying at 20 mph
- The dog’s ears turned back and are sitting low against the skull
- The cat jumped onto the counter
There’s no arguing whether these behaviors are or are not true because we can see them and measure them.
Covert behavior refers to internal thoughts, feelings, motivations, and intentions. And a construct is our interpretation of those covert behaviors. If you want to think of covert behavior and constructs as the same thing for now, go for it. The technical differences between those two aren’t as relevant for our level of discussion. Examples of this include:
- The dog is mad that I left him alone and that’s why he pees when I’m gone
- The dog is anxious when I leave him alone and that’s why he pees when I’m gone
- The dog doesn’t know to not potty inside and that’s why he pees when I’m gone
- The dog is trying to claim his territory when other dogs pass by the house and that’s why he pees when I’m gone
As you can see, there’s a whole lot of debate as to whether these behaviors are or are not true. Here we have the exact same overt behavior- urinating when left home alone- but I’ve heard all of the above as constructs people have created to explain that particular behavior.
Here’s the thing with covert behavior and constructs: we’ll never know if they’re accurate. Heck, we’re even terrible at guessing the covert behavior of our fellow humans, with whom we speak the same language! How can we assume that we’re better at guessing the covert behavior of another species that doesn’t speak the same language?
One more vocab word to throw into this mix: labels. A label is something we use to describe someone. For example, we could say a pet is:
All of those are labels.
Why does all of this matter?
All of this matters for a few different reasons:
The words we use shape our judgment, and ultimately can shape how we feel about our pets
Let’s say we have a dog who sometimes lies down in the middle of a walk and cannot be coaxed to get up for several minutes at a time.
Overt behavior: lies down while on a walk for several minutes
Constructs and labels I’ve heard people use to describe this behavior:
- Too hot to walk
- Watching everything; attentive or focused on their surroundings
- Getting old and joints might hurt
Now, how do you think the person who thinks their dog is stubborn feels about them vs. the person who thinks their dog is getting old with ouchy joints feels about them? My guess is those two people have a pretty different relationship with their pets and feel very differently about this particular behavior.
Our judgment shapes our decisions, for better or worse
Let’s continue with the previous example. Each of those people would likely choose a different path to change that behavior. This might look like:
- Stubborn: force them to walk
- Too hot to walk: manage by walking in the morning when it’s cool
- Scared: seek help from a behavior professional
- Watching everything; attentive or focused: train a watch me or attention cue
- Getting old and joints might hurt: speak with their vet about pain management options
One behavior, 5 different options for treatment based on our assumptions about what’s happening. But, and I can’t stress this enough:
We don’t know if our assumptions about covert behavior are accurate.
That means that we can’t make training decisions based on covert behavior, constructs, or labels. While we might be right in our assumptions, we can end up doing more harm than good if we’re wrong. For example, if the person thinks their dog is stubborn but actually they’re too hot to walk or in pain, forcing them to walk could end up seriously injuring them. Assumptions do not make for effective decisions; observing overt behavior makes for effective decisions.
Our assumptions cloud our observations
I see people on a daily basis who are struggling to reconcile seemingly incompatible thoughts, theories, assumptions, etc. that they have about their pets. The most common I hear is reconciling the “sweet” label with a dog who is biting people. This usually comes in the form of the following statement:
They’re so sweet 95% of the time but it’s just that 5% we’re worried about
It’s hard for us to wrap our heads around how a pet who is sweet can also bite someone; sweet individuals don’t hurt others. When I see this happen we usually have a discussion that we’re the ones setting up that false dichotomy; their pet can still be very sweet with them but also fearful and biting other people. They’re not mutually exclusive behaviors.
Sometimes, though, I see people struggling with that more than others. In those situations, I often see where folks will hold fast to a label or construct that they have about their pet and it makes it so they cannot see overt behavior that contradicts that label.
For example, I’ve worked with a few clients who had leash reactive dogs and would even bite other dogs in some situations. The dog was showing clear signs of stress around members of their own species and even though we went through all the typical spiels about anxiety-related behaviors, they still believed that their dog truly enjoyed other dogs because they had a dog friend as a puppy. They couldn’t see the stress signals I was pointing out to them because that contradicted who they thought their dog was. Needless to say, those folks made much slower progress than their counterparts until we reached the point where they were able to see with their eyes, not their ideas.
Hold up. Don’t you use labels and constructs all the time?
Yep! I do. Even though we shouldn’t make training decisions based on constructs or labels, they’re really helpful for communicating as long as all involved parties are defining those words the same way. For example, if I had to describe leash reactivity as barking, lunging, growling, and air snapping at the end of a leash when a dog is near another dog every time I talked to a client, we’d never get anything done. Instead, I tell my client, “this behavior that you’re describing I’m going to call leash reactivity.” That way we can communicate more efficiently and be on the same page as to what we’re defining as leash reactivity.
But, what about the anxiety label you use? Isn’t that an assumption?
Right again! Those of you who have done an initial consultation with me might remember that when I describe your pet’s behavior as an anxiety-based behavior, I’ll actually say it’s a behavior based in anxiety, stress, fear, however it helps you to think of it. The next sentence is usually something along the lines of, “Those are all technically different, but for our purposes, I’ll use those phrases interchangeably because we can treat them all the same way and that’s really what I’m more interested in.”
Those are, however, all still labels or constructs. The reason I feel comfortable using those to make behavior decisions is because of body language. There has been enough study on body language, and studies are still coming out, that we can make an accurate enough guess as to broad strokes of covert behavior– like excitement and fear. So really those behavior decisions are happening based on body language and other behavior observations (overt behavior), and we attribute those body language signals to different constructs or labels.
Back to the training challenge
Alright, I think we’ve detoured from this month’s training challenge enough for it to now make sense.
Your task for this month is to take 1 construct or label that you have for your pet and describe it using only overt behaviors. Here’s an example:
Construct: Zorro likes his new tank setup
Overt behavior: Zorro is spending more time basking, less time trying to escape, and less time performing repetitive swimming behaviors in his new tank setup than his old one.
If you’re feeling extra ambitious for this challenge, you can then turn that overt behavior into a different construct or label so you can see how easy it is for folks to create different explanations for the same behavior, like this:
New construct: Zorro has realized that I have finally outsmarted him when it comes to him escaping and he’s given up. I’m finally smarter than my turtle.
- Choose a construct or label.
- Think about what your pet is actually doing when you use that construct or label. What do you see with your eyes?
- Share your results with us on Facebook or Instagram @petharmonytraining
- If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we have a video training on overt vs. covert behavior in our Beginning Behavior Modification course.
P.S. We have something BIG in the works to help even more pets and their people. Stay tuned for an announcement later this month!